当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国当代医药》 > 2010年第8期 > 正文
编号:12039422
37例经尿道等离子电切前列腺术的效果观察及并发症研究
http://www.100md.com 2010年3月15日
第1页

    参见附件(1176KB,2页)。

     [摘要] 目的:探讨经尿道等离子电切前列腺术在前列腺疾病治疗中的效果及安全性等。方法:选取2007年10月~2009年3月在本院进行治疗的74例前列腺增生患者为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组(传统经尿道电切术组)37例和观察组(经尿道等离子电切术)37例,后将患者的治疗效果、手术时间及并发症发生率等进行统计分比较。结果:观察组的总有效率明显高于对照组,手术时间也短于对照组,并发症发生率也低于对照组,P<0.05。结论:在前列腺增生的治疗中采用经尿道等离子电切前列腺术较传统电切术效果卓著,优点明显较多,因此值得临床推广应用。

    [关键词]经尿道等离子电切前列腺术;传统经尿道电切术;前列腺增生;效果

    [中图分类号] R697+.32[文献标识码]C [文章编号]1674-4721(2010)03(b)-157-02

    The study of effects and complication on plasma electtonics resection of prostate with37 cases patients

    LIU Risheng, DENG Wandi, FENG Cailing

    (The Shilong Boai Hospital of Dongguan City, Guangdong Province,Dongguan 523325, China)

    [Abstract] Objective: To study ffects and safty on plasma electtonics resection of prostate. Methods: 74 examples with prostatic hyperplasia patients from October 2007 to March 2009 in our hospital were divided into control group(traditional transurethral resection group)37 cases and observation group(plasma electtonics resection of prostate group)37 cases, then the effects, operation time and complication rate of all the patients were analyzed and the results were compared. Results: After the study, the author found that the total effective rate of observation group was higher than that of control group, and the operation time of observation group was shorter than that of control group. The complication rate of observation group was lower than that of control group, P<0.05, and it had statistical significance. Conclusion: The effects of plasma electtonics resection of prostate with prostatic hyperplasia are better than traditional transurethral resection. The advantages are more,and it is worthy of further popularization and application.

    [Key words] Plasma electtonics resection of prostate; Traditional transurethral resection; Prostatic hyperplasia; Effects

    本文中,笔者选取在本院进行治疗的74例前列腺增生患者为研究对象,分别采用不同方法进行治疗,现将结果及经验总结报道如下:

    1 资料与方法

    1.1一般资料

    选取2007年10月~2009年3月在本院进行治疗的74例前列腺增生患者为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组(传统经尿道电切术组)37例和观察组(经尿道等离子电切术)37例。两组患者基本情况比较,P>0.05,具有可比性。见表1。

    1.2方法

    对照组采用传统经尿道电切术进行治疗,观察组采用经尿道等离子电切术进行治疗,后将两组患者的手术时间进行统计,并将治疗效果进行评价比较,同时对并发症的发生率也进行统计,加以比较。

    1.3 评价方法

    治愈:症状及体征等消失,体积减小至正常,且质地也变软至正常;有效:症状及体征等有较大改善,体积虽未缩至正常,但缩小也较明显,质地有所变软;无效:各项症状、体征均无改善[1]。

    1.4 统计学方法

    所得数据采用软件包SPSS 10.0进行统计分析,采用χ2及t检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(1176KB,2页)